Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

Login

Remember Me

New to Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

18 Mar 2007

ah men! under where?

Introducing the first installment of Ah Men!, a weekly column by Fridae's new featured blogger Jonathan Zhang about life, sex, and all things phallic.

I've always been a firm believer of the really overused and clichd line that goes something like:

Self portrait by Jonathan Zhang
'It's not what's outside that matters, but what's inside that really counts.'

I must say, it makes a really great tagline when you're trying to sell pacemakers or butt plugs to the general public.

But personally, I re-interpret the quote along the (visible brief) lines of one's undergarments. You know the things that you wear under your ehrm garments. Definition is necessary because there are some people out there who like the feeling of raw skin and denim rubbing against each other. Or perhaps those who are going through their 'Emperor's New Clothes' phase of life in terms of underwear. For all these people, this column is just for your entertainment and perusal. But for those who support the support that underwear provides to their loins, you can show your pride by reading this article in nothing but your undergarments.

But here's the problem: You may look dashing in that expensive tailored suit of yours. You can have a bubble butt fitted into those butt-tight jeans. And them Onitsuka Tigers somehow give you a posture that accentuates more muscle than fat in your body. But underneath it all, if all you have on is a pair of Crocodile (not Lacoste because there's a difference okay!) underwear with the colour(s) marred by numerous laundry mishaps when it comes to separating the colored and the whites ehrm well, here's the pamphlet for the nearest nudist camp. They don't do underwear over there.

Of course, not only does a pair of comfortable, figure-flattering (not penile-flattening) underwear look hot, it has plenty of other benefits that back up this great 'whatever that's inside' philosophy of life. The benefits of wearing great underwear are countless. You secretly feel sexy on the inside. You are all prepared for sex. It gives that unnaturally big bulge on your pants that you could never obtain without the stuffing of Kleenex. I'm sure somewhere amongst those benefits there's something related to increased production of semen. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if it somehow reduces the risk of heart disease, cancer, high cholesterol and diabetes altogether at the same time!

But out of all these, I feel that the most practical aspect of a good pair of undies would be that they make great conversational topics. I'm sure everyone has experienced that great big ominous silence when conversation topics have run dry. You check your handphone for phantom SMSes. You scroll through your call lists. You scratch your groin. You take a sip of your protein shake. All this in the hope that something random pops up in your head as a topic to talk about. Well, just let me say that it did get me out of a 'tight social spot' now and then, by suggesting the following activity:

'Okay, let's play a game. Guess what is the colour of my underwear?' (best accompanied with cheeky smile, wide grin or perhaps a hand on conversation partner's thigh)

When I say 'tight social spot', I also mean that in an 'adjusting my wedgie' kinda sense. Point to your underwear and attempt to pull out the brief lines to enunciate the fact that you're keen for someone to guess the colour. Do a quick shift-adjust and release with a snap of the waistband. And there you have it, underwear adjusted back into its proper place. The good thing out of underwear as social topics is that it makes it so much easier to break into idle chitchat about sex. Which makes it easier to break into the topic of having sex. Which then probably makes it even easier to break into someone else's sexy bits. And voila! Sexy underwear saves the day!

At this point, I can see the ladies reading this smirking to themselves, the whole time thinking about women's credit cards and how 'the men don't get it'. But gurl you ain't spared from the plight of the underwear too! There are women out there who wear mismatched panties and bras. And it's of the most tragic colours and fabrics that can rival Betty Suarez anytime. Think: white bra with black lacy panties, a beige bra with black silk panties or worse, or skin coloured undies which really ought to be banished alongside granny pants. The only exceptions, I think, are sports bras. A tad difficult to find panties that look as sporty as the designs sports bras have these days. Swimming trunks, come to mind though.

You must be thinking then, 'What is the big hoo hah over underwear? Wear or don't wear, it's still under what, no?' Well, all this is in preparation for that one freak accident whereby a passing gust of (really strong global warming-related) freak wind somehow tears off my clothes, leaving behind only my tighty-whities for some reason. In this day and age of blog/YouTube-crazy people, the camera phones will be whipped out faster than you can log into the web site itself. And before you know it, your fugly underwear pic will be all over cyberspace.

The thing is, you never know when you might have to show another person your underwear for some reason or other. It might be at the office when you get cruised by someone, or perhaps one of those detention scenes at the Immigrations Checkpoint. Always be prepared, that's what I'm trying to say.

Of course when all the clothes and undergarments are finally off, it's not what's outside that counts now, but really what's inside that matters.

Inside your ass, that is.

Ah Men! will be updated every Sunday. Visit Jonathan Zhang's personal blog "Spankthemalenurse".

Reader's Comments

Comment #1 was deleted by its author
2. 2007-03-18 10:06  
Wow, fridae has sunk to a real low with this article..... butt crack low.

I'm sorry I apologise, not really qualified to comment since i lost interest 5 paragraphs into article.

I suggest Fridae call an emergency meeting to improve its content.
Comment #3 was deleted by its author
4. 2007-03-18 10:39  
something for the gals, editors. something for the gals......

guys, dun let those credit card marketers make you hedge us out!
Comment #5 was deleted by its author
Comment #6 was deleted by its author
7. 2007-03-18 11:18  
1. Puerility can always be forgiven, if it is entertaining.

2. There's no sadder trash than bland trash.
8. 2007-03-18 11:19  
Congratulations to fridae on recognising and recruiting the talents of the sexy, witty and hot Jonathan Zhang ! I, for one, love his writing style and I'm really looking forward to more articles from him.

Being an underwear fan myself, it was not hard for me to enjoy this article. I can say that Jonathan's advice does work. I've always found that bringing up the topic of underwear is a great way to stear a conversion smoothly into sexual territory. Either asking your trick to guess your underwear or asking them to tell you about theirs makes a smooth transition to other, hotter topics.

Well done Jonathan and fridae ! This is what we need to see more of. Can't wait for the next article :-)
Comment #9 was deleted by its author
10. 2007-03-18 11:43  
Members should see pictures from Nation VI - Muscle Beach & Pirates Paradise parties. Those pictures show so many good looking guys in tight swimwears/underwears. Don't they make your d*ck hard?

Also, there's a new movie called "300" & it features so many masculine & muscular guys fighting in tight underwears. You can see their muscles & armpits & you can feel the testosterone pumping.

Here are my 2 cents. If a gay guy looks good then he should show a little more. Maybe, he should wear underwear to gay circuit parties. (Note: It's just a naughty thought. Don't make the police ban our gay circuit parties.)
11. 2007-03-18 11:49  
Name one single Fridae fellow that has not already understand the importance of nice sexy underwear. That would be interesting to know!
12. 2007-03-18 13:36  
"But out of all these, I feel that the most practical aspect of a good pair of undies would be that they make great conversational topics." --> ok..this is just plain desperate.
13. 2007-03-18 15:55  
a little long winded but not bad anyway..
14. 2007-03-18 16:01  
oooooh and what's next...

fisting men with jockstraps on?

less rambling and more substance please...
15. 2007-03-18 16:16  
Oh my god, I know this guy. We were in the same cohort during our poly days.

Jon if you're reading this, hi! It's me Vel. =D
16. 2007-03-18 19:39  
I have no idea what this artical is about???

Is there a point to it???

Confused.
17. 2007-03-18 22:15  
This is just a low quality, pointless, predictable, cynical, tiresome to read story. The first installment of "Ah Men"? Oh Boy! Thanks for the warning, I will not bother in future.
18. 2007-03-18 22:54  
I'm a little bit confused about what he presents.

What and where is the topic of this article?
19. 2007-03-18 23:08  
an exercise in pointlessness?

an excursion into the charted and mapped territories?

re-hashed, blah and absolutely passe. I can't make a head or tail of this woolly woozy wishy-washy crap.

To the Editors at Fridae:
PLEASE bring back ALVIN TAN!!
20. 2007-03-19 02:41  
This article is boring and theres alot of smoking.
21. 2007-03-19 02:44  
This man cannot write.
22. 2007-03-19 03:27  
wey! brother, write like you know la dun write like u imagined. and youtube is passe where were you?

its the xtube gen, baby!

women always wear bras n panties that don't match. dude u nid2b with a woman LONG ENOUGH to be able to understand and WRITE correctly. Even when yr just writing lightly.

hahahahahaha...
sobs.
where's alvin tannnnnnn
23. 2007-03-19 09:22  
semper ubi PINK sub ubi!
24. 2007-03-19 10:54  
To all you Skunk out ther who love to Comments.. here's a Frank suggestions..
To whoever fridae appoints to writes.. either virgin or fresh.. we should give tis guy Jonathan a chanced. True! articles may be bored, but dont splash a bucket of Freezin Cold water over him.
and to you mr.Jonathan, begins with some humors would ya..
good luck.
25. 2007-03-19 13:09  
I happen to agree w/cyclo6...please give the new guy a chance...so what if his first article doesn't win him the nobel prize for journalism? BUT...to the editors of fridae.com..(if there ARE anyh editors at fridae.com) .please work WITH your contributors. 1. Proof-read articles relentlessly for grammatical errors 2. Explore opportunities to better/succinctly express an idea to an overly critical audience and 3. Make sure an article has a point and purpose...really, to wear, how to wear, or not to wear underwear...is that REALLY a pertinent question??
26. 2007-03-19 13:23  
true la guys.. give it a try. its a first... its not even started yet. note to writer: pressure to perform, over thought, unrealistic comments which lead to no substance. take it easy, go with the flow.
27. 2007-03-19 13:31  
I think the article's fine. Not all articles are supposed to provoke great thoughts and... ideas? It's just relaxed reading. Anyway, it generated lotsa comments, so I guess it served some purpose..

BTW, I do agree that wearing nice undies at all times is way important! :thumbsup:
28. 2007-03-19 14:09  

If you like underwear, it's the article for you. If you don't, stay clear!

Same goes for National Geographic and BBC news! :)

29. 2007-03-19 16:48  
this article would have benefited from an expose on what type of underwear to buy to flaunt, or what to do when you're just in underwear. ;)
30. 2007-03-19 17:23  
huh? what nonsense... This article is anything but relax or intellectual... It's basically a "talk rubbish" kind of article that doesn't get to the point.
Comment #31 was deleted by its author
32. 2007-03-19 20:15  
Is that it??

Kinda pointless.. I admire the effort but he DESPERATELY needs a better subject to waffle on about. It wouldnt hurt to take it out of the gutter also in terms of his thinking/ writing. This kind of article only proves what so many people think about gay guys - shallow, slutty and bitchy - but SURPRISE not all of us are - so come on fridae - let's pick someone who has an ounce of intellect, tact when it comes to wit, and a sense of sophistication when writing.
33. 2007-03-19 21:55  
justincdiem sums it quite well,
so does neoeros and the rest of the 90% of those guys who commented.

Not only was this guy a lousy writer, he left an extremely bitter aftertaste.

If a pen is more powerful than the sword, someone should take this Weapons of Mass Annoyance out of the public.

Judging by the extremely bad stats that he's received for his debut, imagine what the outcry would be if this goes on for another 2 issues.

By then it'll probably be too late when the masses calls for his head on a stick.
34. 2007-03-19 23:25  
seriously, I think we should just give him a chance. its his first article for fridae and constructive critisism would help him more than simply flaming him.

I for one, love his metaphors and will always be a fan of his writings!

that said, its true. underwear makes or breaks the whole package [pun intended]. unsexy underwear will earn a BIG FAT thumbs down in my books. Boxers or Boxer-briefs all the way man... heh.
35. 2007-03-20 02:56  
Oh Dear...
36. 2007-03-20 07:21  
I almost fell asleep reading this, between being offended by the assumption that every man is on the prowl and buys underware for that purpose, to poor writing and unfunny.
37. 2007-03-20 11:04  
Such harsh comments from people who can't even spell correctly. Give Jonathan a break! I for one, was amused by this article and look forward to his next one. Kudos Jon, I'll be reading your blog soon enough!
38. 2007-03-20 13:16  
Well, I do admit with some of the negative comments here. It did take me several takes to finally finish reading article. And to think, I'm a huge underwear worshipper.

You just get lost almost everywhere along the lines. The flow is far from smooth. And though the metaphors have every potential to be funny, they're simply doused off because of the dragging lines. There are just too many attempts to be witty putting substance at a compromise.

Sometimes the most powerful line can be the simplest one. Less is more. Substance is crucial, especially if you want to write an article this long.
Don't overdo it.

But hey, it's his first try. Let's give the guy a chance.
39. 2007-03-20 17:58  
Never bother about underwear,its either white or never :P
40. 2007-03-20 18:17  
OK.... well, i can see that this guy has much potential... he is only 22 (?) yo ... so I think one day he will be a great writer. I give him credit for that, and for trying. BUT this article while showing promise, was a big yawn. The last line of the article so totally so totally uncalled for. I think fridae should really edit these things more carefully.
Mr.Zhang, you will be great oneday, and I hope to read your writings in the future, but get some constructive criticism before submitting your work. Experience is your greatest tool.
Comment #41 was deleted by its author
42. 2007-03-20 18:58  
he is better than alex au, dinah and alvin!

fridae should hire him to write DAILY not WEEKLY articles!

HAHAHAHAHA.
43. 2007-03-21 08:11  
Yes give him a chance new talent never flourishes in a torrent of negative bitchery. Get a life some of you as well as some new undies!
44. 2007-03-22 18:46  
Hello Jonathan:

Could we see a pic of your bf?

Thanks!
45. 2007-03-23 14:45  
Good Lord...almost as interesting as "to moisturize or not to moisturize". Oooh...next installment?

Maybe something less shallow and mundane next time. Content is key Fridae. Good grammer and vocabulary does not, a good article or writer make. :)

OMG...PHALLIC? To be honest, I had to look it up. Who are you trying to impress?
Comment #46 was deleted by its author
47. 2007-03-23 19:27  
with reference to my post - all i can say is "sarcasm is wasted on idiots"
48. 2007-03-24 02:06  
I left out something in my initial post.

Am looking forward to your next article. Please choose a better topic this time.

Go get them...Tiger!

Please log in to use this feature.

Select News Edition

Featured Profiles

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

Like Us on Facebook

Partners

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement