Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

Login

Remember Me

New to Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

18 Apr 2011

Netherlands: Gay marriage's diamond anniversary

Boris O. Dittrich, a member of parliament at the time when the Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalise same-sex marriage in 2001, wrote in an op-ed that despite gay people marrying "civilisation as we know it didn't end."


The Netherlands celebrated the 10th anniversary of the world's
first legally binding gay marriage on April 1, 2011. 
Helene Faasen and Anne-Marie Thus who became the world’s first
legally wed lesbian couple told AFP: “We married for love, not
politics. But of course we were aware it was an historic moment.”

Boris O. Dittrich is advocacy director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights Program at Human Rights Watch. He was the first openly gay member of parliament in the Netherlands (1994-2006). He wrote an op-ed titled "Gay marriage's diamond anniversary" in the Los Angeles Times on April 17. The following is an excerpt: 

Ten years ago this month, when the Netherlands became the first country in the world to legalize same-sex marriage, most Dutch people were in favor of the law, but a vocal minority insisted that gay marriage would mean the end of Western civilization. It took a political slugfest to get the law passed. 

I was a member of parliament at the time and the initial sponsor of the same-sex legislation. The Netherlands had introduced gay civil unions in 1998; I regarded them as a step forward but still insufficient. Why should heterosexuals be able to fence off a part of civil law — marriage — and defend it as exclusively theirs? This "separate but equal" status reminded me of apartheid in South Africa and Jim Crow in the United States. When two people decide to share their responsibilities and commit themselves to each other by entering civil marriage, their sexual orientation shouldn't matter to the government.

The Christian Democrat party was fiercely opposed though. Many of its members and those in other right-wing Christian political parties announced that if the bill passed, it would devalue the institution of marriage, open a can of legal worms and cause the rest of the world to shun the Netherlands. Sen. Hannie van Leeuwen, a leader of the Christian Democrat party, stated it would be the best for everybody concerned to stick to civil unions. 

A decade later, of the nearly 75,000 civil marriages that take place in the Netherlands each year, about 1,400 involve same-sex couples. Heterosexual couples did not turn away from the institution of marriage, nor did the world isolate my country. Civilization as we know it did not end. And, as far as I can tell, God did not punish the Netherlands.

On the contrary, the bill paved the way for nine more countries (Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Argentina, Portugal and Iceland), one city (Mexico City), the District of Columbia in the U.S., and several U.S. states (Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Iowa, New Hampshire and, briefly, California) to allow gays to marry. In Slovenia, Nepal and Australia, same-sex marriage is now on the political agenda.

I believe this trend is unstoppable, as is the broader cause of gay rights. But that doesn't mean justice will proceed without furious debate and even bloodshed. My colleagues working for gay rights in many parts of the world have been beaten, arrested, sodomized and even assassinated for their work. In these countries marriage equality is not even on the wish list. Gay rights in those places means ending violence against homosexuals and ending criminal sanctions based on sexual orientation. David Kato, a gay human rights defender in Uganda, was brutally slain a few months after a Ugandan newspaper printed his picture and others with an anti-gay article and the label "Hang them."

Read the full article in the Los Angeles Times here.

Netherlands

Reader's Comments

1. 2011-04-19 12:45  
Traditionally, a diamond anniversary is the 60th anniversary, but according to Wikipedia, you do have a point as far as US culture is concerned (diamond jewellery). I suspect that a diamond anniversary is universally accepted as the 60th one, rather than the 10th. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedding_anniversary
2. 2011-04-20 00:16  
Admirable, marriage is a wonderful matter. You and another half belong to one another.
3. 2011-04-20 02:10  
Amazing! :-)

After all, the Netherlands is the first country to legalise same-sex unions. And few other countries can boast of having open homosexuals serving in armed forces, public services, & politics- how wonderful that all that is possible. That's something to be proud of, esp in an increasingly hostile envirornment experienced even within the Netherlands itself. WE are all in full support for the Dutch to keep & preserve their famous tolerance - except when it comes to certain extremist, homophobic, misogynist religion(s). :p
4. 2011-04-20 14:14  
I googled and found that diamond anniversary is the 60th or sometimes 75th anniversary. 10th anniversary is called tin anniversary :-p
5. 2011-04-20 20:41  
Anyone with grandparents or parents in their eighties who married in their twenties has celebrated their DIAMOND wedding. No need to look it up. It's the 60th anniversary. Very weird of Fridae to attribute it to the tenth.
6. 2011-04-22 15:06  
Guys.... Don't you think 10 years of homosexual marriage equals 60 or 70 years marriage of the heteros? LOL
7. 2011-04-23 09:45  
awwww krusty old Kumabro_oz having another pointless warble I knew it was too good to last it being reasonably intelligent
on a Serious note though who these days considers them selves half a person just because they're single and is waiting to be found whole in heterosexual style 'marriage'...that's sad as well as pathetic.
8. 2011-04-25 09:11  
It's sad that such a profoundly significant article in terms of refuting the hetro-religious argument against gay marriage gets mainly comments surrounding the meaning of 'diamond'. Come on people. Let's not get distracted from the message - that gay marriage has had not one scrap of effect on their cries that (paraphrased) "...Heterosexual couples will turn away from the institution of marriage, and that the world isolate countries that embrace equality and that God will punish any countries that do...."

The Netherlands experience is a strong weapon in our case for equality in marriage. I really don't give a toss if it is diamond, tin, alabaster, or clay and those who argue this point have no concept of the enormity of the Netherlands experience.
9. 2011-04-26 07:54  
whew! wish someone wants to marry me.. :)
10. 2011-04-28 07:55  
Next year's the Queen's Diamond Jubilee. And it ain't ten years she's been on the throne. It's not a difficult concept to get right, Fridae!

Please log in to use this feature.

Social


This article was recently read by

Select News Edition

Featured Profiles

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

Like Us on Facebook

Partners

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement