Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

記住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

新聞&特寫

« 較新的 | 較舊的 »
3 Sep 2004

gay sex to remain illegal: india court

India's high court has dismissed a three-year-old petition seeking to legalise gay sex acts.

The high court in the Indian capital of Delhi on Thursday rejected a petition that sought to repeal Section 377, which criminalises consensual sexual relations between adults of the same sex, the BBC reported.

Section 377, which is also found in the penal codes of Singapore and Malaysia, states that whoever has voluntary sex "against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal will be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 10 years."

Filed by the Naz Foundation, a HIV and AIDS organisation, it argued that it is wrong for homosexual acts to be a punishable offence in 21st century India and alleged that the police use the law to harass gays.

It also cited the law as being a hurdle in the AIDS awareness campaigns run by the various AIDS welfare agencies as the laws restricts many men from coming forward to receive information on how to protect themselves from the disease.

The court however ruled that the "validity of a law" cannot be challenged by anyone who is "not affected by it." Legal experts are however debating the ruling that petitions against the law cannot be brought by anyone who is "not affected by it" while some argue that public interest petitions should be filed by affected people rather than by organisations representing them.

Lawyers for the government also argued that homosexuality cannot be legalised in India because society strongly disapproves of it.

"Indian society, by and large, disapproves of homosexuality and justifies it being treated as a criminal offence even when adults indulge in private," said a government lawyer.

The court heard their argument that the abolition of the law dealing with what they termed as "unnatural sex acts" could open the "floodgates of delinquent behaviour."

"While the right to respect for private and family life is undisputed, interference by public authority in the interest of public safety and protection of health and morals is equally permissible.

"This is precisely what the law does," said the government affidavit.

India

讀者回應

搶先發表第一個回應吧!

請先登入再使用此功能。

Social


請選擇新聞及專欄版本

精選個人檔案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

讚好

合作夥伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement