New research has found that some lubricants used in anal or vaginal sex can cause damage to those tissues that can leave people more vulnerable to sexually transmitted infections, including HIV.
Surprisingly, this is the first time that anyone has even looked at the question of whether basic sexual lubricants can cause damage to rectal tissue. The studies were presented at the Microbicides 2010 conference in Pittsburgh at the end of May.
A decade ago research presented at the first microbicides conference showed that nonoxynol-9 (N-9), a spermicide added to many lubricants to prevent contraception, was extremely toxic to rectal tissue. Later studies demonstrated that it increased the risk of becoming infected with HIV through vaginal sex.
The gay community learned to avoid lubes containing N-9, and pressured manufacturers to remove it from most products.
This long overdue study of the lubes themselves put six of the most commonly used products to a series of tests used to evaluate the toxicity of potential microbicides – products that might protect against HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.
An online survey by International Rectal Microbicides Advocates identified the most popular lubes from among more than 150 brands and variations on the market.
It turned out that the most important factor is the osmolality, the amount of salts in the product.
Water-based lubes that were hyperosmolar "were actually damaging the epithelium of the rectal and cervical tissue," said Charlene Duzzetti, the University of Pittsburgh researcher who led the study. "The one that was not hyperosmolar, that didn't have any salts in it, and the silicon-based one, did not show any damage."
The top layer of cells that provides the greatest barrier protection from disease was stripped away by the lubes. The higher the osmolality of the lube, the greater the damage; but the damage was not as severe as what had been seen in tests of products using N-9.
Water-based lubes that scored poorly were Astroglide, Elbow Grease, ID Glide, and KY Jelly. The only water-based lube that scored well, with no harm to tissue, was PRe. The condom-friendly silicon-based Wet Platinum scored equally well.
The openly gay founder of Wet Lubricants said he was not surprised his product did well in the study.
"According to the study, ingredients in some of the lubricants tested were found to be responsible for stripping away cells on the rectal tissue, thus increasing the risk of transmitting disease," Michael Trygstad, founder and CEO of Trigg Laboratories, said in a statement. "The subject of the research study, the Wet Platinum product we market, does not contain these dissolved salts or sugars and was found by the study to have no toxicity."
A separate study, by UCLA researcher Pamina M. Gorbach, analyzed a group of 229 men who had engaged in receptive anal intercourse (RAI) within the last month, and 192 women who had done so within the last year. It asked about sexual behavior and tested them for chlamydia and gonorrhea.
It found that 76 percent used water-based, 28 percent used silicon-based, and 17 percent used oil-based [Crisco] lubricants, often in combination.
The men and women who used lube at the last recorded RAI were about twice as likely to have chlamydia or gonorrhea as those who did not use lube.
"This suggests that the use of some rectal lubricant products may increase the risk of STIs," Gorbach said.
Unfortunately, the sample was not large enough to see if there were any differences between the types of products used.
IRMA's chairman, Chicago AIDS Advocate Jim Pickett, said it's known that "dry" sex, with no lube, often results in great physical damage to the rectum. It may be more harmful than using even the most damaging lube. He called for more research and urged the gay community to become wise consumers when it comes to purchasing lube, just as they did in shunning products containing N-9.
Duzzetti suggested looking for lubes labeled isotonic or isosmolar, or silicon-based and condom compatible.
The silver lining in this research is that products behaved pretty much the same in both vaginal and rectal tissue samples. It suggests that a product that is safe in the vagina will be safe in the rectum. This may simplify the process of developing a microbicide that protects against HIV infection.
Bob Roehr is a biomedical writer with a focus on HIV and infectious disease. The article was first published in the Bay Area Reporter, San Francisco's oldest and largest local LGBT newspaper; and is republished with the author's permission.
讀者回應
1) latex-safe AND
2) rectum-safe.
On the other hand, KY and a few other water-based in the research conform to the first BUT NOT the second criterion. And it's worrying considering that rectum is biologically more vulnerable than vagina.
But Wet Platinum may not be always available. It's not sold in most pharmacies or distributed by AFA. (But I'd encourage AFA to do so and replace the water-based lubricants sealed in small packets it distributes with a silicone-based lub. This is a good way to raise awareness about the superiority of silicone-based lub over water-based ones.). If you only have water-base lubricant now, what could you do?
I think you could try to buy a silicone-based lubricant in 'sex stores' which specialise in condoms, lubs and other products used for sex. These stores are found in Orchard Road and Bugis, among other locations in Singapore. If you can't find silicone-based lubricants or can't afford to buy them (they should be slightly more expensive but can still be had for under S$20/bottle), should you discontinue use of any lubricant for anal sex? I don't think it's wise either. Because not using any lubricant at all could worsen things. You could cause tear which leads to even more risks because you may then be exposed to blood. You should still use water-based lubricant if it's the only lub you have, but then remember to consistently use a condom correctly. Latex condoms provide a physical barrier that is much more reliable than the rectal skin. As such, EVEN IF water-based lubricants may remove some skin on the rectum, as long as you wear a condom, you should still be quite safe.
This study gives the impression that, if 2 healthy & non diseased persons were to engage in say, unsafe sex, and uses water based lubricants, they will more likely contract STI/HIV? Duh? But where does the STI/HIV come from in the first place if both parties were free from any disease to begin with? Surely, the expressions of such spontaneous microbial manifestations is unprecedented.
Puzzling how the study conveniently omits the correlation between safe and unsafe sex with any one of the lubricants studied.
Someone on Fridae is seriously losing sleep and feeding us one horror story after another. And the topic is LUBE (wtf?!) No better news to tell or repeating same story is a new fashion for this season?
If you want safest water based lube that does not come with any additives it might be worth trying J Lube, then? - Pure white dry polymer powder- mix it with water to a desired consistency- no E codes, no nothing, no irritation, condom/ anal mucus/latex/ skin-safe. 20 dollars all it cost. You can make out of one small container up to 10 Litres. Minimum investment- maximum return. Have fun, boys.
PS. I think we need to remind people to use condom more often and which lube is RIGHT for it, not to waste Fridae resources for nothing.
What the study was investigated is the potential dammages lubes could cause to the rectum and therefore the potential increased risk for people who only use lube and no condom.
Conversely, other product called microbicides are currently under investigation but to date none has been found to be effective. Research continues...
To know more visit the IRMA website http://www.rectalmicrobicides.org/
J-lube is the a veterinary lubricant. It is particularly useful in “dry” calvings or lambings when large quantities of lubricant are required
It is a non-sterile lubricant used for obstetrical work, rectal examinations and artificial inseminations in large animals. It may also be used to lubricate catheters, stomach tubes, probangs etc, but is it not sterile.
Now it is up to you what you do with it but the kind of water you are using to make it will decide of the osmolarity and of its potential danger for the rectum lining...
damn!
you are right about veterinary stuff. it is indeed designed for purposes you described. yet in every major sex shop that based in gay areas you will find it on shelves. Expensive in Europe- cheaper in the USA, unavailable in Asia. No sex is 100& safe and no lube ever will be 100% sterile- it is NOT a sterile product is not on farmaceutical register and come on- sterile lube for non-sterile ass. So no loss and no danger in it, really (not unless you are in the late stage of AIDS when every lube will cause you an allergy or damage)
There are two ways to play this game
FIRST is FUN: use any lube that suits you, douche and use condom (or not-if that's yours and your partner's choice)
SECOND: be stuck on Fridae talking about the lube and consequences. HINT: NO LUBE NEEDED :)))))))
Your call hehe
Here is Melbourne I am fortunate enough to live close by to Mannhaus where there is a huge range of lubricants - water based, silicone and vege oil based crisco. For me it has always been a simple water-based lubricant like wet stuff or mega lube. Some of these products are simple, locally produced and have anti-bacterial properties. I guess my interpretation is the less additives the less likely to interfere with rectal lining.
@cat_boy very practical lateral thinking
@thekentang18 comment 13 - totally agree with your very practical approach - be guided by common sense and what works for you.
since money and sex are things that have consequences and impact major life decisions about mental and physical health, its good we finally have some gay activists with the balls and research to finally tell men the truth in the Suzie Orman no nonsense way of communicating
I know some people's business models and financial future are dependent upon sex with strangers, but its time to listen to Jan from Bangkok about the sucking stuff
There are "isotonic" lubes out there (such as PRE, the one they researched) which should not damage the rectum, but the problem they aren't labelled as such.
In order of preference I'd use:
1) Silicone lube, if you can afford it
2) An isotonoc lube
3) Spit.
@Everglaid: you piece shows how we need to get the message home about lubes. The point is, it's exactly the "simple water-based lubricant like wet stuff or mega lube" that are the risky ones: what they have in them makes them hypertonic - damages the rectal cells.
That's bad enough, but if you then add stuff to make them antibacterial, that's really adding to the risk. The anti-bacterial used in KY Jelly is chlorhexidine, which is already known to be dangerous.
So, to recap
- For know AVOID water baed lubes unless you know they're isotonic
- Avoid ones with antibacterials in them.
請先登入再使用此功能。