Attitudes of Singaporeans and permanent residents toward gays and lesbians – although “sharply polarised and predominantly negative” – have become a little more favourable, according to researchers from the Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University (NTU).
The nationally representative study conducted in 2010 surveyed 959 Singaporeans and permanent residents aged 18 or older. It was a continuation of a similar survey conducted in 2005. The study was published in the Asian Journal of Social Psychology in December 2012.
When results from both surveys were compared, Singaporeans' attitudes towards homosexuals appear to have shifted more positively.
In 2005, 68.6 percent of respondents expressed negative attitudes, 22.9 percent had positive attitudes and 8.5 percent were neutral.
In 2010, 64.5 percent of those surveyed held negative attitudes towards homosexuals, while 25.3 percent expressed positive attitudes and 10.2 percent were neutral.
"Taken together, the results show a small but significant trend toward greater tolerance of homosexuals,” said lead researcher Professor Benjamin Detenber in a press release.
“Clearly, public opinion is still highly polarised on this issue, but slightly more people are sharing the middle ground in 2010 compared to 2005,” he said.
Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men
1. Sex between two men is just plain wrong.
2. You think male homosexuals are disgusting.
3. Male homosexuality is a natural expression of sexuality in men.
4. Sex between two women is just plain wrong.
5. You think lesbians are disgusting.
6. Female homosexuality is a natural expression of sexuality in women.
To what degree would you accept or not accept:
1. A homosexual co-worker.
2. A homosexual teacher.
3. A homosexual friend.
4. A homosexual neighbour.
5. A homosexual family member.
As the attitude items came from the Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men (ATLG) Scale, a well established composite measure, respondents were not asked about section 377A, a law which criminalises sexual relations between men in Singapore.
Religion
As was the case in 2005, the 2010 study found that religion is significantly related to attitudes and acceptance. Among the religious groups, freethinkers were the most positive in their attitudes – significantly higher than Christians, Buddhists and Muslims. Irrespective of specific religion, people who are more intrinsically religious – i.e. people who say that religion is integral to their lives – are more likely to have negative attitudes towards homosexuals and are less accepting of them.
Interestingly while Christians had the second lowest ATLG (attitudes) scores, they were more accepting of gay men and lesbians than Buddhists and Muslims.
The study noted that it is possible for people to hold negative attitudes towards homosexuals but accept gay men and lesbians on a more personal level, whether as co-workers or friends, regardless of whether they perceive homosexuality to be a choice. The researchers suggested that the precise reasons for this could be the subject of future research.
Gay characters in the mass media
Those who had higher interpersonal contact with gay men and lesbians and watched more films and television shows with gay characters were also likely to express more positive attitudes toward gays and lesbians, and to show greater acceptance.
The interaction between interpersonal contact and mediated exposure was found to have a significant effect on attitudes, but not on acceptance of gay men and lesbians. Therefore, interpersonal contact was a significant moderator of the relationship between mediated exposure andATLG, but not acceptance.
Previous studies showed that exposure to gay characters in the media has the most effect on the attitudes of people with little or no interpersonal contact with gay men and lesbians. In contrast, the 2010 study found that viewing gays and lesbians in the media has the strongest effect on the attitudes of people with many personal contacts with gay men and lesbians.
The researchers suggested this could be because of the positive correlation between interpersonal contact and media exposure to homosexuals in this sample of Singaporean adults. Alternatively, it could be due to the way in which exposure to homosexuals in the media has been measured. The 2010 study used the total number of films and TV programmes watched, whereas other studies used viewing frequency and scale measurements of para-social relationships between viewers and media characters.
Interpersonal contact
Similar to studies conducted elsewhere, the survey found that Singapore citizens and permanent residents who have a gay or lesbian family member or know someone who is gay are less likely to have negative attitudes and be more accepting.
As with other studies, the Singapore survey shows that interpersonal contact appears to have a bigger influence in shaping attitudes and acceptance of homosexuals than mediated exposure to gay characters – i.e. seeing gays and lesbians in films and television programmes – which also predicted less negative attitudes and greater acceptance.
The study noted: “… people who had some homosexual personal contacts had significantly more positive attitudes than those with no homosexual personal contacts, and people with more homosexual personal contacts had significantly more positive attitudes than those with few personal contacts. Similarly, greater interpersonal contact is likely to affect acceptance.”
The research team is planning to conduct a similar survey in 2015.
列印版本
RSS Feed: 
讀者回應
I see this as pretty much innate in humans. We evolved in a world where strangers were a life and death threat. And our brains are always seeking to classify everything encountered, people included.
We can't really expect the brain to stop working the way its always worked. So making people more familiar with differences should be the focus.
And at some point, people give up trying to classify all the ways that people are different and just start dealing with others as individuals. It becomes a lot easier the more we do it.
The government could also play a role in this. By educating the people, and thus shaping tolerance toward the gay community, just like they have educated people and shaped religious and racial tolerance.
"It's OK to be GAY"
There should be a zero tolerance policy to any kind of hatred and bigotry, same as there is a zero tolerance policy toward religuous and racial hatred and bigotry.
Not only happening in Singapore, several well-known celebrities in Hong Kong have shown courage to announce their gay identity. That may also have contributed more acceptance of gays here.
We still have to work on and gain social respect to show we are just as normal as heterosexuals.
Remnants of gay life as it was can still be seen in many Asian countries. The warok in Ponorogo for instance. My country the Netherlands fought hard to eradicate those 'Homosexual Gangs' as they were called by the authorities.
Homosexuality has over the ages found more acceptance in Asia than in the west. It is saddening to see that many Asian people now cling on to those values that they perceive as traditional..... Which by no means are traditional since traditional values had a more accepting attitude towards homosexuality.
Now again it is 'the west' that brings the 'right' values. And it saddens my heart to see that again those traditional values of acceptance are even more under threat. Ways to live with gay people and that are truly traditional and sometime centuries old vanish. Now also threathened by gay rights activists. But I am afraid that it is too late to restore them and that there is no other way for gay ppl to get acceptance than to fight for their rights the 'western' way.
The only thing that we can do is not forget the gay emperors of China, the gay Samurai from Japan and the Warok from Ponorogo!
http://www.gay-art-history.org
Click on the guided tour of just browse around that magnificent site! See hundreds of years old gay pictures from China, Japan and many more!
Go Nanyang Technological University (NTU)!!!
Can we do the next study on why testicles hang to the left, or something really useful???? A cure for cancer, maybe, a cheap and portable water desalination plant? Dontcha love social 'sciences'?
The last survey that we heard about around 2007 was a bunch of students phoning up people in an HDB block. It didn't sound very professional. I don't know exactly how this one was carried out.
I hope it isn't an attempt to sway the judges in the upcoming constitutional cases, by playing the majority card. The point about Constitutional protections is that they are there precisely to protect minorities from the tyranny of the majority. If a minority is facing a lot of prejudice, it is even more important that the Courts protect them from unfair laws designed to target them, as in the case of 377A and gay men.
請先登入再使用此功能。