Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

記住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

時尚娛樂

« 較新的 | 較舊的 »
1 Sep 2009

The Time Traveler’s Wife

Would the flim adaption of Audrey Niffenegger's bestseller, The Time Traveler’s Wife be as romantic and moving as the book?

Director: Robert Schwentke 

Language: English

Starring: Eric Bana, Rachel McAdams, Ron Livingston, Jane McLean, Stephen Tobolowsky, Arliss Howard

Release Date: 3rd September 2009 

Rating: PG (Some Nudity)

When Audrey Niffenegger romance novel The Time Traveler’s Wife became a publishing sensation in late 2003, you couldn’t hop on the subway without seeing someone (usually female) reading it. Every literary fag got a raving earful from his fag hag about how good it is, and every bookstore put up dozens of copies on their most visible shelves.

It’s no surprise then that romance junkies anticipate this one the way teenage girls look forward to the Twilight saga, and kids get excited over Harry Potter movies. But now that the movie is here, we’re sad to have to tell you that it’s a bit of a disappointment. What worked well on paper hasn’t really translated into screen magic. 

The novel tells a strange but touching story of a woman (Rachel McAdams) and a man (Eric Bana) who love each other, but are destined to be together and apart at the same time. While she lives like any other person, he suffers from a rare genetic abnormality that causes him to make uncontrollable leaps through time. Sometimes he goes back in time, and other times, he jumps forward into the future. 

Sure, the story is preposterous, but the novel work because of its convincing and compelling first-person perspectives. The two characters’ struggles in keeping their love alive found resonance among many female readers, who enjoyed vicarious thrill of being in a very complex and very romantic relationship for some 10 to 14 hours.

The movie, on the other hand, has a hard task of crystallizing all this into 2 hours. Mostly, it relies on Rachel McAdams and Eric Bana’s expressive faces to articulate (and condense) most of those complex emotions. And unfortunately, as earnest and talented as they are, neither actor can compel us into believing that any of this stuff is actually happening. 

Because of its many plot points, the movie moves relatively quickly and we never quite get a good handle on how the two characters truly feel about their situation. If The Curious Case of Benjamin Button requires depth, character development and a 3-hour runtime to make us believe the fantastical premise, so does The Time Traveller’s Wife. Time, as it turns out, is an enemy of the characters, and the moviegoer.

Well, watch the movie anyway. If you walk out of cinema feeling moved but vaguely dissatisfied, make your way to the bookstore.  

讀者回應

1. 2009-09-02 16:48  
We both enjoyed this film a lot; it wasn't spoiled by having read the book, it's just a different animal. But if you don't enjoy romantic films it's probably not for you.

請先登入再使用此功能。

Social


請選擇新聞及專欄版本

精選個人檔案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

讚好

合作夥伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement