The repeal of the anti-gay Section 377A would probably have been a success had Lee Kuan Yew been the current Prime Minister
Singaporeans are mourning their founding father that many in the LGBT community say has been the city state’s most gay friendly politician.
“Today we mourn the passing of our founding father and strongest supporter of LGBT rights in Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew. As with all issues, he was a pragmatist and repeal of Section 377A would probably had been a success had he been the Prime Minister then,” reported trevvy.com.
Lee Kuan Yew died on March 23 at the age of 91. He was Prime Minister from 1959 to 1990 and instrumental in transforming the country from a colonial trading post to an independent, thriving country.
In 1998 when Lee Kuan Yew was a guest on a CNN International radio and asked about gay rights, he replied: "Well, it's not a matter which I can decide or any government can decide. It's a question of what a society considers acceptable. And as you know, Singaporeans are by and large a very conservative, orthodox society, a very, I would say, completely different from, say, the United States and I don't think an aggressive gay rights movement would help. But what we are doing as a government is to leave people to live their own lives so long as they don't impinge on other people. I mean, we don't harass anybody."
In 2007 while a meeting with the youth wing of the People’s Action Party he was quoted as saying: "If in fact it is true, and I have asked doctors this, that you are genetically born a homosexual - because that's the nature of the genetic random transmission of genes - you can't help it. So why should we criminalise it?"
In his 2011 book titled “Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going” he said, “Homosexuality will eventually be accepted. It’s already accepted in China. It’s a matter of time before it’s accepted here."
Gay rights are a contentious issue in Singapore, with many either wanting to retain or abrogate the British colonial-era Section 377A law which states that any male person who, in public or private, commits, abets, procures or attempts to procure any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years.
The government claims it does not actively enforce that ban and the issue of repealing or retaining it has also been brought up in Parliament in recent years even as many Christian and Muslim religious groups want no debate on discarding the law. Last year however, the highest court in Singapore upheld the colonial-era law criminalizing gay sex.
Watch a media clip of Lee Kuan Yew’s view on same-sex relations here:
Singaporeans are mourning their founding father that many in the LGBT community say has been the city state’s most gay friendly politician.
“Today we mourn the passing of our founding father and strongest supporter of LGBT rights in Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew. As with all issues, he was a pragmatist and repeal of Section 377A would probably had been a success had he been the Prime Minister then,” reported trevvy.com.
Lee Kuan Yew died on March 23 at the age of 91. He was Prime Minister from 1959 to 1990 and instrumental in transforming the country from a colonial trading post to an independent, thriving country.
In 1998 when Lee Kuan Yew was a guest on a CNN International radio and asked about gay rights, he replied: "Well, it's not a matter which I can decide or any government can decide. It's a question of what a society considers acceptable. And as you know, Singaporeans are by and large a very conservative, orthodox society, a very, I would say, completely different from, say, the United States and I don't think an aggressive gay rights movement would help. But what we are doing as a government is to leave people to live their own lives so long as they don't impinge on other people. I mean, we don't harass anybody."
In 2007 while a meeting with the youth wing of the People’s Action Party he was quoted as saying: "If in fact it is true, and I have asked doctors this, that you are genetically born a homosexual - because that's the nature of the genetic random transmission of genes - you can't help it. So why should we criminalise it?"
In his 2011 book titled “Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going” he said, “Homosexuality will eventually be accepted. It’s already accepted in China. It’s a matter of time before it’s accepted here." Gay rights are a contentious issue in Singapore, with many either wanting to retain or abrogate the British colonial-era Section 377A law which states that any male person who, in public or private, commits, abets, procures or attempts to procure any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years.
The government claims it does not actively enforce that ban and the issue of repealing or retaining it has also been brought up in Parliament in recent years even as many Christian and Muslim religious groups want no debate on discarding the law. Last year however, the highest court in Singapore upheld the colonial-era law criminalizing gay sex.
Watch a media clip of Lee Kuan Yew’s view on same-sex relations here:
I recently saw a show on PBS television here in the states all about this good man... I was so impressed with him and his ideas... he will be missed by many people not just the LGBT community.
I think he accomplished a lot in Singapore and hope his ideas continue.
I have no doubt he was a great man and his achievements are monumental. His legacy is totally secure.
But to go from there and suggest that the repeal of Section 377A would have taken place had he been Prime Minister now is surely somewhat facile! He remained arguably the major force in Singapore politics even when his son became Prime Minister. If he sincerely felt Section 377A should have been repealed, I believe he would have steered that through.
Personally, I do not believe his views about Singapore in general had altered much from his earlier statement, "Singaporeans are by and large a very conservative, orthodox society." I doubt even with his force of character he could have changed that. He certainly did much to tone down the anti-gay feelings of some in the community with his later statements. But I can not agree the law would now be off the statute books if he was the Prime Minister today. RIP!
Hello my dear,
i am happy to contact you after
viewing your profile and it interest
me to contact you for a genuine relationship,
please contact me here(nicolemakuza1992@hotmail.com)
so that i will share my feelings with
you for further communication.
Thanks, your friend Nicole.
(nicolemakuza1992@hotmail.com)
读者回应
I think he accomplished a lot in Singapore and hope his ideas continue.
But to go from there and suggest that the repeal of Section 377A would have taken place had he been Prime Minister now is surely somewhat facile! He remained arguably the major force in Singapore politics even when his son became Prime Minister. If he sincerely felt Section 377A should have been repealed, I believe he would have steered that through.
Personally, I do not believe his views about Singapore in general had altered much from his earlier statement, "Singaporeans are by and large a very conservative, orthodox society." I doubt even with his force of character he could have changed that. He certainly did much to tone down the anti-gay feelings of some in the community with his later statements. But I can not agree the law would now be off the statute books if he was the Prime Minister today. RIP!
Hello my dear,
i am happy to contact you after
viewing your profile and it interest
me to contact you for a genuine relationship,
please contact me here(nicolemakuza1992@hotmail.com)
so that i will share my feelings with
you for further communication.
Thanks, your friend Nicole.
(nicolemakuza1992@hotmail.com)
请先登入再使用此功能。