Gordan Lake, an American and Manuel Valero, his Spanish husband have been gripped in a custody battle and unable to leave Thailand for over a year.
The surrogate mother of their baby girl Carmen refused to sign papers that would allow the child to obtain a passport after discovering the parent's sexual orientation.
The two men have been living in hiding in the city with Carmen and their two year old son.
"It's the day we've been waiting for - for a long, long time. Today is one of the most important days of our lives," Mr Lake said outside Bangkok's Juvenile and Family Court. "The court should give us custody of Carmen because it's the right thing to do."
"Baby Carmen has the right to be with her biological father, who supports her financially and has cared for her since she was born," Mr Rachapol Sirikulchit, the couple's lawyer, told the Daily Telegraph. "The priority is to consider the benefit for children and that they have the right to live with their biological parent."
According to the couple, Patidta Kusolsang, the Thai surrogate, initially handed baby Carmen over to the couple on the day she was born, but changed her mind and refused to sign the required documents.
Lake is the biological father of baby Carmen, while the egg came from an anonymous donor. Kusolsang claimed she did not previously know of the parents' sexual orientation.
The pair's case is especially tricky as a slew of recent surrogacy scandals in Thailand prompted the country to pass a law banning foreigners from engaging in the practice.
The law came into effect after Carmen was born but may have a leaning on the case. The fact that Thailand does not recognise same-sex marriages may also affect the judge's decision.
Testimony is scheduled to be completed by March 31.
打印版本
RSS Feed: 
读者回应
This is bad reporting not to point this out.
"The surrogate mother of their baby girl Carmen refused to sign papers that would allow the child to obtain a passport after discovering the parent's sexual orientation."
They are scared they won't get custody due to not being nationals. A totally different issue.
Don't you find it wrong to play the gay card at the first opportunity?
There COULD be other reasons she won't sign. Money? Or maybe she wasn't told he is gay? All of this would come out in due process, yet they stay in hiding at cost to the child and all concerned.
Respect the law of the land.
This is good to use the gay card as one of the burden of proofs to illustrate how gay couples are being manipulated by this woman due to anatomical disadvantage as men not having womb, and of being gay. What if this is a single hetero man who wants to have baby without having the responsibility to marry a woman? Would he be viewed differently? perhaps more forgiving?
the law may have the potential to be good for different situation, but it should not be blind all the time. that's why law proceeding requires burden of proof from each sides.
请先登入再使用此功能。