Test 2

Please select your preferred language.

請選擇你慣用的語言。

请选择你惯用的语言。

English
中文简体
台灣繁體
香港繁體

登入

记住我

初到 Fridae?

Fridae Mobile

Advertisement
Highlights

More About Us

新闻&特写

« 较新的 | 较旧的 »
27 Oct 2010

How we can fight back against homophobia

Navanethem Pillay, the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights, says it's time society spoke up against homophobia and hates crimes, and calls for homosexuality to be decriminalised.

The following  was first published as an op-ed in The Washington Post on Oct 23, 2010. The writer is the United Nations high commissioner for human rights.

Seth Walsh walked into the garden of his family's home in Tehachapi, Calif., last month and hanged himself. He was just 13. Before making the tragic decision to end his life, however, he had endured years of homophobic taunting and abuse from his peers at school and in his neighborhood. He is one of six teenage boys in the United States known to have committed suicide in September after suffering at the hands of homophobic bullies. 

Navanethem (Navi) Pillay, the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights. Photo: ohchr.org
In the past few weeks there has been a spate of attacks directed against people perceived to be gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. In New York on Oct. 3, three young men, believed to be gay, were kidnapped, taken to a vacant apartment in the Bronx and subjected to appalling torture and abuse. In Belgrade on Oct. 10, a group of protesters shouting abuse hurled Molotov cocktails and stun grenades into a peaceful gay pride parade, injuring 150 people. In South Africa on Sept. 25, a large-scale march in Soweto brought attention to the widespread rape of lesbians in the townships, assaults that perpetrators often try to justify as an attempt to "correct" the victims' sexuality

Homophobia, like racism and xenophobia, exists to varying degrees in all societies. Every day, in every country, individuals are persecuted, vilified or violently assaulted, even killed, because of their sexual orientation and gender identity. Covert or overt, homophobic violence causes enormous suffering that is often shrouded in silence and endured in isolation. 

It is time we all spoke up. While responsibility for hate crimes rests with the perpetrators, we all share a duty to counter intolerance and prejudice and demand that attackers be held to account. 

The first priority is to press for decriminalization of homosexuality worldwide. In more than 70 countries, individuals still face criminal sanctions on the basis of their sexual orientation. Such laws expose those concerned to the constant risk of arrest, detention and, in some cases, torture or even execution. They also perpetuate stigma and contribute to a climate of intolerance and violence.

But as important as decriminalization is, it is only a first step. We know from experience in those countries that have removed criminal sanctions that greater concerted efforts are needed to counter discrimination and homophobia, including legislative and educational initiatives. Here again, we all have roles to play, particularly those in positions of authority and influence, such as politicians, community leaders, teachers and journalists.

Sadly, those who should be exercising restraint or using their influence to promote tolerance too often do just the opposite, reinforcing popular prejudice. In Uganda, for example, where violence against people based on their sexual orientation is commonplace, and activists defending the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people face harassment and the threat of arrest, a newspaper published a front-page story on Oct. 2 "outing" 100 Ugandans it identified as gay or lesbian and printed their photographs alongside the headline "Hang Them."

We must recognize such "journalism" for what it is: incitement to hatred and violence.

Political leaders and those who aspire to public office have a particularly important duty to use their words wisely. The candidate for public office who, rather than appealing for tolerance, makes casual remarks denigrating people on the basis of their sexuality may do so in the belief that he or she is indulging in harmless populism -- but the effect is to legitimize homophobia.

Last month I spoke in Geneva as part of a panel discussion on decriminalizing homosexuality. The event was sponsored by a diverse group of 14 European, North American, South American and Asian countries. In a video message, Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu lent his support and spoke with passion about the lessons of apartheid and the challenge of securing equal rights for all. "Whenever one group of human beings is treated as inferior to another, hatred and intolerance will triumph," he said. It should not take hundreds more deaths and beatings to convince us of this truth. It is up to all of us to demand equality for all our fellow human beings, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

读者回应

1. 2010-10-27 19:47  
Getting ride of homophobia....hmm...get rid those nit wits who breath in religion. Kinda make them hard to think for themselves
2. 2010-10-27 23:32  
I dont think those gay bashers in the US and Europe are steep in religious beliefs. Mostly are just a bunch of 'uncultured' and 'unreligious' people who leave the law in their own hands.

We should stop blaming religions for all these bad occasions that affect us gays. After all, religions are the ones that shape our modern civilisations, laws and cultures to be what it is now. It is extremely naive to place the blame on religion when most of such events occur in a free liberal part of the world like the US and Europe. Gay bashings seldom occur in Asian countries.

3. 2010-10-28 02:01  
Those who think religion has little to do with gay bashing should visit some Muslim countries like Pakistan, Egypt, Iraq etc. I have had gay friends from those countries and their lives and careers would be in danger if they were out. The religion is used as a justification to hurt others and without that justification, perhaps reason would prevail.
4. 2010-10-28 02:40  
i was once being raped by two gay men, is that bashing, well human right should first correct the abuse on human, the allowing of porn films is an abuse to human it self, when a government see making money from porn as a business, is that not abuse, why will a fellow human be happy to record and sell movies of where your fellow human is having sex, the UN should first fight that
5. 2010-10-28 12:22  
Hmmmm ... I think she's taking a ride on that wonderful "It Gets Better" Bandwagon

Still any voice against homophobia is a welcome voice

There is no person more venomous than a religious gay basher...99.998% of all homophobia has its origins in religious ignorance
6. 2010-10-28 15:37  
obviously cultural homophobia has it's roots (excuse the term) in the beliefs of the desert religions like Judaism with Christianity and Islam that are corruptions of it having more greatly advertised this hatred, I would surmise that many violent offenders are reacting from thoughtless brain washing than from intelligent religious fervour, it's always good when others out side of our communities speak loud and show strong support on our issues it's important that we also give them support in ways that matter by living our lives with dignity and being seen to be sexually responsible and worthy citizens, there is less to object to when a persons character is seen as exemplary
7. 2010-10-28 16:11  
What I am - a gay Asian male - is not my choice, but how I live my life is. Being gay in this world is challenging because I cannot take things for granted. Being Asian in countries that are not has subjected me to varying degrees of prejudices. I have uneasily understood that xenophobia is a natural human trait although acceptance is still difficult. Ironically, xenophobes have made me wiser in picking my battles and stronger in fighting them. My weapon of choice: Their conscience.
8. 2010-10-29 04:25  
Heh colegarcia, I agree with u 100%...the source of many evil...pornographies and cheap sex (prostitutions, money boys etc), casinos (gambling), drug addictions, alcoholism etc etc etc I believe do not come from religious people....I dont understand why some gays, especially those from western countries, tend to blame religions for all the damage that is caused. They talk as if they are so cultured blaming this and that, probably they need a mirror to see their own images and weaknesses.

When in actual fact, history has proven that our civilisations got its hospitals, charities, organisations, laws all from Religion. Without religion we will just be like animals. Simply absurd thinking going on now.

Do we think we can live and prosper without religion? I can bet we will turn into cannibals eating anything, and have free sex with men and animals, and slowly we will turn into Animals just like the Animists or the Pagans in ancient Europe...cause there were no barriers, restrictions, guidelines, cultures to guide us. I am not exaggerating. Just go back to old history and learn. What happens in the past can happen again if humans make the same mistake.
9. 2010-10-29 11:41  
I think that homophobia stems from multiple sources, religious ones, some people don't like what they don't understand, and some is just old fashioned prejudice. I have had half of my family disown me because I'm gay, and they are Nazarine Christians. Religion does play a part. I'm not saying religion itself is bad, but some of them are NOT accepting, make no mistake.
10. 2010-10-30 01:53  
8. Ridiculous in my opinion. Religion was created to have order. Humankind has out grown the need for it. As far as government interceding in my private affairs, I am not in agreement with that at all.
I personally find Pornography boring. But if others enjoy it in the confines of their home, that is fine with me. Its not government's role to say what grown adults should do in their private lives. And for that matter religion should have no bearing in our lives as well.
11. 2010-10-30 13:15  
ShawS, I save my judgments for you. I think you only speak on the base of limited knowledge and a wishful thinking based on already formed values, that is, by your religion.

If you have the opportunity to watch a documentary made by PBS (Public Broadcasting Syndication) titled "Rome Empire in the First Century. This movie will, hopefully, open your knowledge and re-think about what history books have told you to believe. One of my history teacher once made the distinction between "studying the history" versus "studying the study of history."

In this movie, written facts are studied and verified with other written stories to make sense of what really happened in the time those written facts were written. Were they describing reality? or just reflections of the writers' ideals conflicts (aka fictions) or political purposes. This is more of an analytical studies because reading was only a skill for the haves, the poor were prevented to have this skill. So the only way the poor "know" some information is by being "told" by the person of power with whatever purposes "he" wants to gain from the illiterate poor people. After that I would like to know your opinion. Good luck!.
12. 2010-10-31 02:25  
I agree with Ms Pillay's view that "The first priority is to press for decriminalization of homosexuality worldwide." This is especially true of countries where the people have substantial trust on their govt/legal system. One such country is Singapore. If the govt in Singapore doesn't amend or repeal S377a, then the people who generally take their govt's words at face value would tend to perceive homosexuality negatively. The schools can't teach positive ways to come out and have safer gay sex if any activity gay is, by definition, illegal. Without allowing the schools, the media, the health authorities and the NGOs to distinguish the negative from the positive forms of homosexual activities, and thereby promote the positive forms, the govt is obstructing positive development in the areas of homophobia reduction, HIV-fighting, diversity tolerance and, generally, community coherence. As I argued in an earlier comment, if it's so difficult and politically risky to repeal 377a, then amend it. If the anti-gay camp's argument for keeping 377a is that its primarily needed to criminalise CERTAIN kinds of homosexuals (e.g. rapists, molesters, peadophile and heterosexually married), then they should have no objection if there is an amendment to 377a restricting its applications to only these kinds of homosexual activities. Otherwise, they would be hypocrites.
13. 2010-11-04 01:30  
Is this website brave enough to lead the world forward to champion and release by every country, politcians, leaders, statesman, industry and celebrities (the latter, if we have to read about them again) and make the global community realise that being "gay" is not a choice. There are many fine people in the world and private lives are not a tabloid or boardroom issue. Thank You

请先登入再使用此功能。

Social


This article was recently read by

请选择新闻及专栏版本

精选个人档案

Now ALL members can view unlimited profiles!

Languages

View this page in a different language:

赞好

合作伙伴

 ILGA Asia - Fridae partner for LGBT rights in Asia IGLHRC - Fridae Partner for LGBT rights in Asia

Advertisement